Friday, 7 June 2013

We must be knowledgeable to protect our freedoms

In editor Gary Sawyer’s May 26 column he seems to believe it is possible there was no conspiracy at Internal Revenue Service to target conservative groups. He suggests employees took a shortcut or were overwhelmed with these tax-exempt status applications or maybe it was just stupidity.

The serious, unlawful IRS actions must stop and every person responsible for the violations must be held accountable. It has been proven this IRS abuse was not limited to a few employees in the Cincinnati office. Top IRS officials know nothing or plead the Fifth Amendment or get promoted to direct the new office that will be responsible for affordable care (Obamacare).

I suggest readers view the website of the American Center for Law and Justice, www.aclj.org, for details on this very real IRS scandal. The American Center for Law and Justice was founded in 1990 to help protect our religious and constitutional freedoms. Jay Alan Sekulow is the highly regarded chief counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice. Mr. Sekulow’s May 17 written statement to the House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means and other documents are available at this website.

Recently I’ve seen television interviews with Americans, people on the street. Too many people haven’t even heard of Benghazi, the IRS, AP, James Rosen or Department of Justice scandals. We still have our freedoms by God’s grace and by immeasurable sacrifices of our brave military heroes. How tragic if we lose our freedom by our own careless indifference to what is happening in our government.

Judith I. Gandy

Decatur


SOURCE
http://herald-review.com/blogs/letters/we-must-be-knowledgeable-to-protect-our-freedoms/article_67281ba4-ce12-11e2-8d5b-001a4bcf887a.html

Wednesday, 5 June 2013

Saeed's Wife Uses UN Speech to 'Plant Gospel'

The White House and U.S. State Department are once again calling on Iran to release an American pastor jailed for his faith.
   
Saeed Abedini is serving an eight-year prison sentence in one of the most brutal prisons in the world for sharing the Gospel.
   
On Monday, Abedini's wife appeared before the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva to plead for her husband's release.
    
"Why is he being held? Because he exercised his rights of religious freedom, expression and peaceful assembly," she told the council. "I hope that my presence here today will put a face to those that suffer when a government does not uphold its obligation to protect these freedoms."

The 33-year-old Iranian-born pastor has endured torture while in prison.

"On at least two known occasions, Iran's officials have physically tortured my husband," she testified. "These instances of torture have caused my husband to have symptoms of internal bleeding."

The White House said it was "deeply concerned" Monday about Pastor Abedini's plight and promised to press for his release until he was back home with his family. The U.S State Department also chimed in.

"We condemn Iran's continued violation of the universal right of freedom of religion and call on the Iranian authorities to respect Mr. Abedini's human rights and release him," Wendy Sherman, the State Department's lead nuclear negotiator, said.

"We will continue to pursue this in every way possible that we can, through every channel we possibly can," she vowed.

But Abedini is not alone.

Last month, Iranian authorities shut down the largest Persian-language church and arrested its pastor. With less than two weeks to go before Iranians pick their next president, authorities are reportedly targeting individuals and groups deemed dangerous, including growing Christian churches.

Just before ending her U.N. speech, Naghmeh said on Facebook that she wanted to use her appearance to plant the seeds of the Gospel message before a global audience.

"Iran has kept Saeed's imprisonment because Saeed believes in forgiveness of sin through Jesus Christ and that whoever accepts this forgiveness of sin can be reconciled to the God of peace and love," she wrote. "This is the God of peace we are all searching for."

Will Naghmeh's appeal to the UN have any effect on Pastor Saeed's situation? Why does the regime say Christians are dangerous? Jay Sekulow from the American Center of Law and Justice answered these questions and more on Wednesday's Newswatch, June 5. Click play to watch.

SOURCE http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2013/June/Saeeds-Wife-Uses-UN-Speech-to-Plant-Gospel/

It's time for Holder to resign

Let’s begin with a dose of common sense: Credible accusations of perjury compromise the authority of law enforcement officers, regardless of their rank. 

Even at the lowest level, law enforcement officials exercise enormous power – holding liberty in their hands as they exercise the discretion of their office, deciding whom to investigate and to prosecute. 

As the saying goes, with great power comes great responsibility. That certainly applies to those at the top – including the attorney general – the nation’s top law enforcement officer. His chief responsibility: upholding the Constitution and the rule of law. And that requires being honest and forthcoming. 

    Holder has misled Congress, misled a federal court, and misled the American people.

Attorney General Eric Holder has failed in this responsibility. Simply put, with the First Amendment and press freedom at stake, he misled Congress, misled a federal court, and misled the American people.

To recap:  On May 15, 2013, Attorney General Holder told Congress, under oath, the following:

"With regard to the potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material, that is not something that I've ever been involved with, heard of, or would think would be a wise policy."

The problem?  Attorney General Holder had previously signed an affidavit in support of a search warrant in a criminal leak investigation declaring there was: “probable cause to believe that the reporter [Fox News Chief Washington Correspondent James Rosen] has committed or is committing a violation of section 793(d), as an aider and abettor and/or co-conspirator, to which the materials relate.”

He’s never even been “involved with” the “potential prosecution” of the press, yet he told a federal court that there was “probable cause” to believe that a reporter had committed a crime?  How are those messages consistent?

On Monday, the Department of Justice attempted to defend itself, releasing a letter to the House Committee on the Judiciary that drew a distinction between investigations (the subject of the affidavit) and prosecutions (the subject of his testimony).  Here’s the key defense:

Ultimately, as you know, although a Grand Jury has charged a government employee with the unauthorized disclosure of classified information, prosecutors have not pursued charges against the reporter. 

At no time during the pendency of the matter – before or after seeking the search warrant – have prosecutors sought approval to bring criminal charges against the reporter.

The attorney general’s testimony before the Committee on May 15, 2013, with respect to the Department’s prosecutions of the unauthorized disclosure of classified information was accurate and consistent with these facts.

This explanation, however, makes little sense in the real world.  Remember, Attorney General Holder said that he had not been involved with even the “potential prosecution” of the press, that he had not “heard of” such a potential prosecution, nor would he think it a “wise policy.”

If that was in fact the case, wouldn’t that be materially important information to disclose to a court when seeking a search warrant?  If there was no possibility of prosecuting the reporter, why mention the reporter’s potential criminal liability at all? 

In other words, either the attorney general misled the court when it created the impression that its investigation was based on “probable cause” to believe Mr. Rosen committed a crime, or he misled Congress when he minimized the very real significance of the affidavit he signed. 

The attorney general is trying to have it both ways – using the “magic words” necessary to obtain the search warrant he wanted while – much later – attempting to use different (but equally magical) words to escape public accountability for actions that dangerously limit press freedom.

This dissembling may be enough to escape a perjury charge, but it is not enough to maintain the dignity of the office.  Nor is it enough to reassure the public that the nation’s chief law enforcement officer should be entrusted with decisions that implicate core constitutional liberties.

Let’s not forget that this is merely his latest offense as attorney general.

He has stonewalled the Fast & Furious investigation, he’s been cited for contempt of Congress, and most recently his Department of Justice has launched vast and intrusive investigations of members of the media.

As the Obama administration faces, and investigates, scandal after scandal, it is asking us to rely upon the impartiality and integrity of its Department of Justice. So long as Eric Holder is at the helm it will be impossible to trust its judgment or its conclusions.

The American people deserve an attorney general who is dedicated to upholding the Constitution and the rule of law in a direct and honest manner – not dodging questions, parsing words and  misleading Congress and the American people. 

It’s time for Attorney General Holder to resign.

Jay Sekulow is Chief Counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ). Follow him on Twitter@JaySekulow.


SOURCE http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/06/04/it-time-for-holder-to-resign/

Monday, 3 June 2013

Legendary Vocalist John Schlitt Featured on Today's Edition of 'Jay Sekulow Live!

Legendary vocalist John Schlitt will be the featured guest on today's edition of "Jay Sekulow Live!," the popular radio talk show hosted by Jay Sekulow, a regular contributor to Fox News and Chief Counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), one of the most prestigious law firms in the country.

During the show, Schlitt will discuss his music ministry, which dates back to his days as lead singer with mainstream rock band Head East through his years as lead singer of Petra to today's current career accomplishments, including his upcoming plans to record his first-ever Christmas album. Schlitt currently is raising capital for the holiday project through Kickstarter, the popular crowd-funding platform.

The radio show airs noon E.T. daily on Sirius XM Family Talk 131, as well on specific stations across the U.S. For a complete list of stations and times, visit aclj.org/radio-tv/schedule. Following today's airing, the radio show can be heard at the ACLJ archives at aclj.org/radio-tv.

For more information about Schlitt, visit johnwschlitt.com. To learn more or to contribute to his Kickstarter campaign, visit kickstarter.com/projects/johnwschlitt/john-schlitt-the-christmas-project?ref=live. For more information about Sekulow and "Jay Sekulow Live!," visit aclj.org/radio-tv.

Photo caption: John Schlitt, left, is featured on today's "Jay Sekulow Live!" with host Jay Sekulow, frequent contributor to Fox News and Chief Counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ). (McCain & Co. Public Relations photo)

This article is a press release.


SOURCE
http://breathecast.christianpost.com/articles/legendary-vocalist-john-schlitt-featured-todays-edition-8635/

Monday, 27 May 2013

Dick Durbin: No regrets sending IRS after conservative group

On Sunday's edition of Fox News Sunday, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., defended his decision to send the IRS after Crossroads GPS, a conservative group co-founded by Karl Rove, in 2010, The Hill reported.

Durbin told Wallace the reason he singled out Crossroads while not mentioning any liberal group is because the organization was bragging about how much money they were raising.

"Let's get back to the basics," he said. "Citizens United really unleashed hundreds if not thousands of organizations seeking tax-exempt status to play in political campaigns. The law we wrote as Congress said that they had to exclusively be engaged in social welfare and not politics and campaigning. And, so, here is the IRS trying to decide whether or not these organizations really comply with the law. Crossroads was exhibit A. They were boastful about how much money they were going to raise and beat Democrats with."

Durbin said he didn't target liberal groups because he believed that an investigation of Crossroads would serve as a warning shot to all organizations.

“There is no basis for targeting within the IRS. What we basically need to say is all groups need to have the law applied to them equally,” he said.

But a 2010 Politico report said Durbin's request "comes in the midst of a push from the White House to cast doubt on the funding sources of groups like Crossroads GPS — founded by GOP strategists Karl Rove and Ed Gillespie — or the traditionally Republican-friendly Chamber of Commerce."

As it turns out, the IRS targeted some 500 conservative groups, and despite claims by the White House, at least two dozen conservative groups say the harassment is continuing.

“Without question, the IRS misconduct of harassing and abusing our clients was still in high gear from May 2012 through May of this year. . . . To suggest this tactic ended a year ago is not only offensive, but it is simply inaccurate as well,” said Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice.

According to a report at the National Review Online, Cleta Mitchell, the attorney representing True the Vote, has evidence that many of the “dozens, if not hundreds” of conservative groups still waiting for approval received additional reams of invasive questions in the fall of 2012 and later.

Ian Tuttle said that Sekulow Sekulow “plans to file suit in federal court in the coming weeks on behalf of more than two dozen conservative groups that claim their harassment at the hands of the nation’s tax authority continued long past the White House’s purported end date.”

Related:

  •     National Review: IRS actions may have suppressed conservative vote in 2012
  •     Dems twist New York Times story to smear Tea Party members as Nazis
  •     Pattern of abuse? Lois Lerner's FEC grilled Oliver North about prayer
  •     IRS official: 'I have not done anything wrong,' invokes Fifth Amendment
  •     IRS targets Christian groups, demands content of prayers
  •     Armed Homeland Security agents monitor Tea Party at IRS protests
  •     Retired Army officer warns: DHS preparing for war against American citizens
  •     Jay Carney to Piers Morgan: Scandals involving IRS, Benghazi, AP 'don't exist'
  •     Limbaugh: Obama administration operating like 'banana republic-type government'
  •     Obama Executive Order would seize US infrastructure, citizens for nat'l defense
  •     Liberal Daily Kos diarist calls for 'benevolent' Obama dictatorship
  •     Anonymous IRS official: 'Everything comes from the top'
  •     Flashback: Chuck Schumer, Al Franken sign letter demanding IRS target Tea Party groups in 2012
  •     NAACP chair: Legitimate for IRS to target 'admittedly racist' Tea Party
  •     Is the ‘mainstream media’ fomenting violence against conservatives?

----------------------------------------------------------------

If you like this article, you can follow Joe on Twitter @jnewby1956, visit and like his Facebook page, or subscribe to receive email updates when a new article is published.

For hard-hitting conservative commentary, please visit Joe's blog, the Conservative Firing Line. You can also find Joe's articles at Right News Now, Liberty Unyielding and PolitiCollision.


SOURCE
http://www.examiner.com/article/dick-durbin-no-regrets-sending-irs-after-conservative-group

Saturday, 25 May 2013

IRS to be sued in federal court

 ACLJ charges agency's targeting of conservatives continues

The American Center for Law and Justice plans to file a lawsuit in federal court next week against the IRS on behalf of several clients, charging the IRS is continuing to target and harass conservative groups applying to create 501(c)3 and 501(c)4 tax-exempt groups, despite White House claims to the contrary.

The ACLJ represents 27 conservative organizations from 17 states that it claims the IRS targeted.

“The White House continues to pursue a narrative that doesn’t square with the facts,” Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the ACLJ, told WND in an email.

“The assertion that this targeted abuse ended in May 2012 is simply not the case,” he said.

Get Jerome Corsi’s scorching new exposé of the American Civil Liberties Union, “Bad Samaritans: The ACLU’s Relentless Campaign to Erase Faith From the Public Square”

Sekulow said “intrusive and unlawful questioning continued after May 2012 with 18 of our clients receiving 26 questionnaires from the IRS from May 2012 through May 2013.”

“Even more troubling is the fact that the IRS sent a letter to one of our clients dated May 6, just four days before the IRS admitted to launching this targeting scheme,” he said.

On May 20, White House press secretary Jay Carney in his daily press briefing claimed IRS targeting of conservative groups had ended in May 2012.

Two days later, Carney changed his story, adding a year to the timeline.

On May 22, Carney told the press President Obama had acted immediately after the release of the inspector general audit of the IRS, taking steps to make sure the agency practice of targeting conservative groups had come to an end:

    Let me say that, as you heard from the president immediately after the release of the independent inspector general’s audit, he is absolutely committed to finding out everything that happened here, finding out who’s responsible for the failures, holding them accountable and ensuring that the IRS take steps so that this will never happen again.

The Treasury Department inspector general for tax administration released its audit in early May. On May 10, Lois Lerner, then director of the IRS Exempt Organizations Division, told reporters the targeting of conservative groups was “absolutely inappropriate,” suggesting the actions were undertaken by “front-line people” working in Cincinnati who singled out groups with “tea party,” “patriot” or “9/12”in their names.

In filing a federal lawsuit against the IRS, the ACLJ has concluded the White House is covering up continuing abuse, implying that Carney’s statement of President Obama’s orders to the IRS has no basis in fact.

“The intrusive and unconstitutional conduct continues – with the IRS demanding donor lists and even requesting lists of what reading materials that organizations used,” Sekulow charged.

“It’s our belief that the only way to stop this ongoing abuse is to take the federal government to court. We are planning to file a federal lawsuit next week in Washington, D.C., on behalf of numerous organizations. This abusive conduct by the IRS must be stopped.”

26 IRS letters

The ACLJ has documented that since May 2012, the date the White House initially said the targeting stopped, the ACLJ received 26 IRS questionnaires sent to 18 clients.

The 26 IRS letters posed further intrusive and intimidating questions, including demanding donor lists and requesting lists of what reading materials the organizations used, with the latest inquiry coming just days before the IRS revealed its targeting scheme.

None of the IRS questionnaires received by the ACLJ in the 26 IRS letters have been rescinded by the IRS, made inoperative or been revised since the release of the inspector general’s audit earlier this month – the second date the White House said Obama had order the abusive and possibly illegal practice to end.

The ACLJ rejects the IRS contention the abuse was limited to a few low-level employees in Cincinnati.

“While letters were sent from that office, our clients received letters sent from other IRS offices around the country – including two in California and from the main office in Washington D.C.,” he said. “There is no question that the IRS scheme emanated from beyond the IRS office in Cincinnati.”

To prove its point, the ACLJ linked to letters the IRS sent ACLJ clients from the IRS offices in Laguna Nigel, Calif.; El Monte, Calif.; Cincinnati; and Washington, D.C.

Acting IRS commissioner also lying?

Attorney Cleta Mitchell, a partner in the Washington-based law firm Foley & Lardner extends the ACLJ accusations to claim acting IRS Commissioner Steven T. Miller made serious misstatements and misrepresentations in his testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee earlier May 17.

Foley & Lardner has more than 40 years of experience in law, politics and public policy, including providing legal advice to non-profit and issue organizations.

Specifically, Mitchell objected to Miller’s claim that “foolish mistakes were made by people [in the IRS] who were trying to be more efficient in their workload selection.”

In a legal memo to “Interested Parties,” dated May 20, 2013, Mitchell pointed out the inconsistency of claiming IRS employees were trying to be more efficient, when the questionnaires submitted to conservative groups were typically multi-paged “dragnet” type questions probing into every aspect of the applying organizations, including the content of prayers by leaders of the groups.

“So the decision to change a system that (prior to 2010) might ask five to six short questions specifically about an application to one that consisted of dozens of questions, necessitating volumes of materials and documents to be filed with the IRS, was done in order to ‘be more efficient’?” Mitchell asked.

Mitchell noted Miller also spoke about IRS employees “taking shortcuts.”

“This was hardly a ‘shortcut’ when it lengthened the process substantially, as documented in the Treasury Inspector General Tax Audit report,” she said.

Michell also objected to Miller’s attempt to scapegoat two “rogue” employees in the Cincinnati IRS office as being responsible for “overly aggressive” handling of tea party requests for tax-exempt status over the past two years, echoing the claim made by Lerner.

“This is completely false,” Mitchell continued.

“In 2011, at least one of the Cincinnati IRS agents assigned to handle two clients’ applications advised me that the Washington, D.C., office was actively involved in the decisions and processing of my clients’ applications for exempt status. This was memorialized in a letter to the agent, Ron Bell, on November 8, 2011. When I called him in December 2011 for an update, he advised me that the applications had been transferred to a special task force in Washington, D.C., for further review.

Mitchell said the “effort by senior IRS officials to lay this scheme at the hands of a few low level’ IRS employees is despicable and must not be tolerated.”


SOURCE http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/irs-to-be-sued-in-federal-court/

Friday, 24 May 2013

Lawyer tells Saudi airline to stop discriminating

Says flights in the United States subject to state, federal laws

A Washington attorney who previously challenged Delta Air Lines when it imposed Saudi Arabia’s Islamic rules on Americans boarding its flights in Washington and New York now has written directly to Saudi Arabian Airlines asking that the Islamic kingdom’s corporation abide by the nondiscrimination laws of the United States when its jets land here.

Jeffrey A. Lovitky earlier approached Delta because it was working under a cooperative agreement with Saudi Arabia to feature flights directly to the kingdom. But in order to do that, Delta was asking potential passengers about their religious affiliation, since Saudi Arabia does not allow Jews to enter.

Eventually, Delta agreed not to ask those questions.

But now Lovitky has dispatched a letter to Khalid A. Almolhem, director general of Saudi Arabian Airlines, in Jeddah.

“The purpose of this letter is to request that Saudi Arabian Airlines immediately discontinue its practice of refusing to sell tickets to persons of Israeli nationality,” he wrote, citing the company’s online ticketing procedures.

“The website requires the ticket purchase to identify the nationality of the passenger from a dropdown list which reflects every nationality, except for Israeli. It is impossible to purchase a ticket unless the nationality of the passenger is selected from the list on the dropdown screen. As a result, persons of Israeli nationality are precluded from purchasing a ticket through the Saudi Arabian Airlines website.”

Read the insiders’ plans for America under Shariah, in “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America,” autographed, from WND’s Superstore.

Officials at the airline’s offices in Jeddah could not be reached immediately, but a screen capture of the website revealed there is no option for a person to identify themselves as Israeli.

Lovitky said while Saudi Arabia has a right to deny visas to Israeli citizens, the kingdom’s own rules do not require a visa if the passenger is traveling through Saudi Arabia en route to another location, such as someone wanting to travel from New York to Mumbai, through Jeddah.

“However, an Israeli national cannot purchase a ticket on Saudi Arabian Airlines between New York and Mumbai, even if the passport of the Israeli national contains the appropriate visa endorsements from the government of India.

See the letter.

“Simply put,” he wrote, “Saudi Arabian Airlines refuses to sell tickets to Israeli nationals, regardless of which country they are going to.”

And that, he said, violates a number of anti-discrimination requirements in the United States.

“There are numerous federal laws which prohibit discrimination on the basis of national origin. … Discrimination in air transportation on the basis of national origin, race, religion, or sex is specifically prohibited,” he wrote.

The Civil Rights Act addresses the issue, as does Title VI.

Since the airline flies to Virginia and New York, those state laws also would be applicable, he noted.

State law in Virginia “states that conduct that violates any federal statute governing discrimination on the basis of national origin shall be deemed an unlawful discriminatory practice in the State of Virginia. … The New York statute is equally explicit,” he said.

“A cause of action exists under state law, as well as federal law, against any airline which practices discrimination on the basis of national origin,” he noted. “Moreover, the operation of an airline is a commercial activity. Saudi Arabian Airlines is thus not immunized from the jurisdiction of either federal or state courts …

“I am awaiting your prompt response as to the corrective actions which will be taken,” he said.

Copies of the letter also went to the Department of State, Department of Transportation, the Saudi Arabian Embassy and others.

It was in 2011 when the earlier dispute arose. Less than two months after WND broke the story about a plan that would have Delta Air Lines impose Saudi Arabia’s Islamic rules on Americans in Washington and New York in order to fly directly to the Muslim kingdom, officials for Delta have promised not to ask anyone about their religious affiliation.

A statement from the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles reported that the airline, following a meeting with center officials, wrote in a letter to the center that, “Delta employees do not currently and will not in future, request that customers declare their religious affiliation. We would also not seek such information on behalf of any Sky Team partner or any airline.”

The letter from Andrea Fischer Newman, senior vice president of government affairs, followed a meeting between Delta officials and Rabbi Abraham Cooper of the center about the airline’s policy.

“Delta has now done the right thing, sending a signal to the Saudis that it will not cooperate with Riyadh’s policy of religious apartheid,” Cooper said. “We hope that all other U.S.-based airlines and around the world will declare and follow a similar policy.

“We also urge the Obama administration to lead the way in demanding that the Saudis drop their overt policy of religious discrimination,” Cooper said.

The airline declined to respond to a request from WND for a comment on the situation, or to explain how such a commitment might affect its contractual arrangements with Saudi Arabian Airlines for Delta to fly into the closed kingdom.

But actor and talk radio host Fred Grandy, who raised the issue before members of Congress, told WND at the time, “Delta passengers have won a significant victory over creeping Shariah. Hopefully, what the Saudis have learned from this experience is that while international corporations and government officials may look the other way at religious discrimination, American air travelers will not.”

The meeting and statements followed weeks of mounting criticism from Jews, Christians, Hindus and others who may have been targeted by Delta’s procedures.

The controversy became public after Lovitky questioned the airline about its plans to discriminate – on the U.S. soil of Washington and New York airports – against Jews and prevent them from boarding flights to Saudi Arabia – based on the religious discrimination present in that nation.

The American Center for Law and Justice called on the Federal Aviation Administration and Congress to investigate the relationship between Delta Air Lines and Saudi Arabian Airlines over the government-owned Saudi operation’s discrimination against Jews.

And ACLJ chief Jay Sekulow noted that U.S. Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., sent a letter to the FAA requesting a probe into the matter “to determine whether Delta Air Lines violated U.S. law or regulation and to ensure no U.S. citizen is denied their right to fly solely on the basis of their religion.”

Larry Klayman, the Washington attorney who founded Judicial Watch and now is of Freedom Watch USA, told WND at the time that Delta had joined Barack Obama in “kowtowing” to “nefarious Muslims.”

His reference was to the famous image of Barack Obama greeting the Saudi king with a bow.

The dispute even pulled the Saudi government into the fray.

“Rumors being circulated via the Internet regarding passenger flight restrictions on Saudi Arabian Airlines are completely false. The government of Saudi Arabia does not deny visas to U.S. citizens based on their religion,” the government said on PRNewswire.

“Liars,” said Pamela Geller on her Atlas Shrugs blog. She noted that on Delta’s own website is the statement, “The government of Saudi Arabia refuses admission and transit to nationals of Israel.”

Delta’s website also stated, “Visitors holding passports containing any Israeli visa or stamp could be refused entry.”

WND reported earlier the issue first was presented to Congress, the public and others by talk radio host and former U.S. Rep. Grandy, whose engaged in his own battle against discrimination when his former radio station demanded he tone down criticism of Islam on his program. He then left the station.

Grandy and “Mrs. Fred,” – Catherine – were interviewed by Talk 1200 show host Jeff Katz about the controversy, which was described as “outrageous.”

Their conversation:

“Creeping Shariah? Now [it is] jetspeed Shariah. Hat’s off to Delta. It looks like Delta will be the first Shariah-compliant airline in the United States,” Catherine Grandy said.

Katz noted, “As a Jewish man, I might not be able to fly on Delta Air Lines in the future.”

Fred Grandy told Katz that he spent time in Washington briefing members of Congress and other policy makers “on this kind of threat.”

“This creeping Shariah, economic jihad, gets you everywhere you turn,” Catherine Grandy said. “This is just not right. I’m sure this will be tested.”


SOURCE http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/lawyer-tells-saudi-airline-to-stop-discriminating/